The article" No-fly zones over Disney's parks come under some flak" talks about the debate around no-fly zones above Disney's parks. According to Wikipedia, a no-fly zone is a territory or an area over which aircraft are not permitted to fly. The idea of Disney no-fly zones was original offered by Disney and it have been law since 2003. They said their purpose is for visitors' safety, but some people think Disney use no-fly ones to get rid of advertising airplanes over the park. No-fly zones are blamed by aircraft owners and pilots because it hurts their benefits. Mark Skinner, the owner of an company which gives helicopter tutor, pointed out that the law is unfair because airplanes can fly over other large theme parks.
https://www.google.com/search?
I agree with the idea of no-fly zones, because as a visitor, I do not wish to receive attack from the sky when I have fun in the park. It seems to be bad news for airplane owners and pilots, but sometimes ad airplane is a little bit annoying. It is also proved that no-fly zones help prevent big terror attacks. What do you think about Disney no-fly zones? Do you think the law should be kept?
Link:.https://newsela.com/articles/disney-airspace/id/5957/
No comments:
Post a Comment